Its difficult to accept, yet of the most heathy, safe, and cheap answers for cancer has been underestimated by standard oncology, as well as by the alternative healthy group too. A few insiders, even those between the great trained therapeutically, criticize laetrile or apricot seed efficiency while fear mongering its supposed toxic elements.2

So I have to address the poisonous issue immediately. The natural wellspring of laetrile or B17 is discovered in apricot seed bits is lawfully accessible as long as its not elevated to advantage cancer patients. It must be a just food supplement. That regular substance source is amygdalin. Unhappily, numerous incorrectly trust this represents a serious cyanide harming danger.

The amygdalin compound has four particles. Two are glucose particles. The other two are cyanide and benzaldyhide. The recent two perform two or three surprising metabolic exercises: they are discharged by and into disease cells just. Else, they stay in the amygdalin compound and are gone through.

There are four molecules in amygdalin compound. Two of them are glucose moleculs, and the other two are benzaldyhide and cyanide. The last two perform two or three surprising metabolic exercises: they are discharged just by and into cancer cells. Or else, they stay in the amygdalin compound and are going through.

The arrangement is very clever. The cancer cells rely on fermented sugar (glucose) for their vitality rather than oxygen. So they attract in the amygdalin mixes for their glucose, however are whacked when they metabolize those aggravates that free the benzalldyhide and cyanide. The glucose is the bait for sugar.

Cancer cells have an enzyme that cannot be found in healthy cells, beta-glucosidase. This enzyme exposes the amygdalin compound, discharging the deadly toxins inside the cancer cell. Only cancer cells absorb amygdalin. Normal cells dont.

Many non-cancerous cells has another enzyme, rhodanese. A couple of free cyanide molecules that may possibly escape are bound to sulfur molecules by rhodanese, making harmless cyanates that are removed in the urine. Is it safe enough?

Most of the cancer patients have used apricot seeds to cure themselves, taking 30 and more per day. Heres an example from down under (Australia), wrote by Jill Stark in March 20, 2010 Sydney Morning Herald article: Paul Reid should be dead. Diagnosed with a rare, hopeless lymphoma, he was given five years, seven tops, by his oncologist.

His cancer curing convention involved taking 30 apricot parts for each day. It looks like he survived all that cyanide! The article has a photograph of a healthy Reid, smiling with a dish with fresh natural food at age 68, 13 years after his diagnosis. He did conform his dietary patterns by removing red meat, sugar and processed foods.

The Aussie daily papers article is here, alongside the typical reportage rubbish from standard specialists who murder more than cure. This video is from G. Edward Griffin, investigative columnist and author of the book World Without Cancer; The Story of Vitamin B17.

More Background on Laetriles Demise

Laetrile is utilized as a part of some Mexican tumor centers alongside B-17 tablets. Sometimes laetrile is injected, however B-17 tablets likewise convey laetrile. The inventor of laetrile, Dr. Ernst Krebs, called laetrile B-17 because it basically takes after the B vitamin chain, however not particularly any of the B vitamins known. He licensed his methodology for separating laetrile yet never could get agreement for treating cancer.

There was scandal around B-17 or laetrile at the place where non-pharmaceutical cancer medicines get shot down with incorrect testing or fake reporting, The Memorial Sloane-Kettering (MSK) Cancer Institute in New York City.

Despite its efficacy laetrile was banned by the FDA during the early 1970s. One person who rejected to go along with the denial and cover-up was Dr. Ralph Moss, who was employed by MSK as a science author then promoted to head of public affairs. He was the PR man in MSK. But in the end he refused to lie and spin untruths. In his Mosss own words:

Twenty years ago [1974 this interview took place in 1994] I was hired at Memorial Sloane Kettering (MSK) Cancer Center in New York as the science writer, later promoted to assistant director of public affairs. Shortly after I went to work there I went to visit an elderly Japanese scientist, Kanematsu Sugiura, who astonished me when he told me he was working on Laetrile (B17), at the time it was the most controversial thing in cancer … reputed to be a cure for cancer.

We were finding this [laetriles efficacy] and yet we in public affairs were told to issue statements to the exact opposite of what we were finding scientifically, and as the years went by I got more wrapped up in this thing and 3 years later I said all this in my own press conference, and was fired the next day, for failing to carry out his most basic job responsibility ie to lie to the public about what goes on in cancer research.

Dr Sugiura, never rejected the results of his studies [he proved that laetrile can heal cancer], regardless of the fact they put huge pressure on him to do so.

When I was at MSK a lot of weird things started to happen to me, there was this cognitive distance between what I was told, and was writing about treatment, especially chemotherapy, and what I was seeing with my own eyes.

My Objection to FDAs Ban

Ernst T. Krebs apparently tested early laetrile safety by injecting himself. This was back in the 1960s. Dr. Krebs died in 1996 at the age of 85.

Evidently were no harmfulness reports about the MSK animal studies with laetrile. The lab rats conditions were enhanced from affected cancer by laetrile and they didnt die from the medicines or create unfavorable reactions. So why was laetrile banned? Just that it is not effective, that is it.

The FDA consider it GRAS (generally regarded as safe) while not approving it for cancer. After all, they have approved drugs that have killed many.

Its logical to accept that laetrile or vitamin B-17 tablets were forbidden because they worked much better than everything Big Pharma could put together, with no side effects, and much cheaper. That would put a serious hollow in the cancer industrys high profits.

Do you know that doctors running chemotherapy in their clinics and offices pay wholesale prices for costly chemo and mark it up 50 to 100 percent in addition to their office fees? Instead of this you can buy apricot seed soft kernels by the bag for very cheap. Chemo can kills all cells that comes in contact with. Thats what causes many so-called cancer deaths mainstream medical treatments.

Amygdalin goes for cancer cells only. If your apricot kernel intake leads to sickness or something unusual, take less. And make sure you have limited sugar intake. People who arent diagnosed with cancer can take only as a preventative a couple a day. But you read the Aussie story. He took 30 apricot kernels daily with a good organic sans sugar diet to help cure his cancer.